The Doctrine Shattering the Global Order in 2026

Reconstruction of Power and Geoeconomic Vectors in the Global Order 2026

The geopolitical and geoeconomic landscape of 2026 is a product of an epistemological break with the principles of global governance established in the aftermath of World War II. The strategic policy of the United States, under the guidance of the second administration of Donald Trump, replaced the concept of multilateral leadership with a model of radical sovereignty defined by its ideologues as “Civil Realism” or “Hard Sovereignty.” This new power architecture is not merely a simple retreat into isolationism but configures a projection of muscular and transactional force that uses trade, technology, and control over energy resources as deterrents and tools for renegotiating global power dynamics.

The centerpiece of this transformation is the belief that unbridled globalization has acted as a vector of weakening of America’s industrial base and cultural stability. Consequently, the 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) and subsequent State Department documents for the period 2026-2030 outline a vision where national security is inextricably linked to reindustrialization, absolute control over borders, and the restoration of American military preeminence in selected geographies, particularly the Western Hemisphere.

Strategic Paradigm of National Sovereignty and Commercial Diplomacy

The strategic doctrine of 2026 is based on an explicit rejection of what is defined as “globalism” and the negation of “destructive bets” made on free trade, which are said to have hollowed out America’s middle class and industrial capacity. The new paradigm seeks to connect national ends with available means in a “clear and ruthless” manner, identifying the survival of the sovereign republic as the only legitimate objective of foreign policy.

This approach translates into a “commercial diplomacy” where the United States leverages its status as the most innovative market and dominant financial system to exert pressure on any nation seeking access to American capital or consumers.

A distinctive element of this phase is the centralization of decision-making in the hands of the White House, with traditional bureaucracies marginalized. The 2025 NSS, accredited to Michael Anton’s vision, reflects an ideological document that breaks with inter-agency consensus norms.

Pillars of National Strategy 2026

Main Objectives

National Sovereignty

Total control of borders and remigration

Economic Dominance

Reindustrialization and end to abuses in the trade system

Trump Corollary

Restoration of absolute preeminence in the Western Hemisphere

Promoting Peace Through Strength

Deterrence towards China and modernization of nuclear weapons

Re-instilling Merit

Elimination of DEI practices and focus on competence

Macroeconomic Results of the Trump Tariff Policy (IEEPA)

The intensive use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) as an economic security tool has transformed tariffs from a temporary measure to a daily pillar. Justifications for imposing tariffs include correcting trade imbalances and countering unconventional threats, such as the export of fentanyl precursors from China or lack of cooperation in managing migrant flows by Canada and Mexico.

Macroeconomic impact of duties (2026-2035)

Baseline Estimate

No IEEPA Scenario

Fiscal revenue forecast

$2.7 trillion

$0.8 trillion (estimated)

Real GDP reduction

-0.4%

-0.1%

Increase in unemployment (end 2026)

+0.65 percentage points

+0.5 percentage points

Net effect on revenues (dynamic)

$2.2 trillion

n.d.

The economic impact of this tariff regime has been profound and asymmetric. U.S. manufacturing production has recorded a long-term growth of 3.2%, but this has had an “spillover” effect on other sectors. Agriculture and construction have experienced significant contractions (respectively -1.1% and -4.0%) due to increased input costs and loss of access to foreign markets through retaliation.

Domestically, tariffs have acted as a regressive tax on consumers. For the average American family, the rise in prices has translated into a real income loss estimated between $1,800 and $2,800 annually. Products such as footwear, clothing, and motor vehicles have seen price increases in double digits, with persistent effects even after import substitution processes.

The Trump administration maintains that these costs are the price necessary for “liberation” from strategic dependence on rivals. By promoting a trend defined as “US+1,” where nations around the world diversify their investments away from China to maintain access to the U.S. market.

Strategic Reconstruction of the Trump Corollary to Monroe Doctrine

The most significant innovation in terms of territorial deterrence is the formulation of the “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine, sometimes referred to as the “Donroe Doctrine.” This principle establishes that the United States will not tolerate any military or economic presence of extra-emispheric powers on the American continent. The practical application of this doctrine has led to a series of unprecedented actions at the beginning of 2026, including the “Absolute Resolve” military operation in Venezuela, culminating with the capture of Nicolás Maduro in January 2026. This operation was justified as a necessary move to eliminate an outpost of the “Axis of Aggressors” (China, Russia, and Iran) within America’s backyard.

Analysis of the Beef Contract between USA and Argentina: Strategic and Economic Impacts

The strategic alliance with Javier Milei’s Argentina represents a vivid example of the application of the extended Monroe Doctrine. In February 2026, a treaty was signed that removed tariffs on over 1,600 Argentine products and quadrupled the import quota for lean beef to the United States, bringing it to 100,000 metric tons annually.

Beef trade data USA-Argentina (2026)

Value / Detail

New TRQ (Tariff-Rate Quota)

80,000 metric tons

Total post-agreement quota

100,000 metric tons

Estimated value of additional Argentine exports

$800 million

Impact on total U.S. supply

~0.6%

Tech restrictions

Only lean trimmings

This agreement has created a significant internal fracture, with lawmakers from beef-producing states like Nebraska and Texas accusing the administration of “stabbing in the back” domestic producers. Experts highlight that Argentine imports represent only 0.6-0.8% of total U.S. supply, a volume insufficient to erode retail prices but capable of eroding the margins of domestic ranchers. In exchange for the beef concession, Argentina has agreed to align its economic security measures with those of the United States, committing to combating unfair commercial practices by companies controlled by third countries (China).

Reconstruction of Military Posture and Strategic Deterrence

The adoption of the 2026 National Defense Strategy marks a transformation from “integrated deterrence” to a strategy of “peace through strength,” with a focus on lethality and territorial defense. The Pentagon has been instructed to reconstruct military culture around the “warrior ethos,” eliminating diversity and equity programs considered distractions from combat readiness.

The top priority strategy is the implementation of the “Golden Dome,” an integrated missile defense shield designed to protect the American continent from hypersonic and intercontinental ballistic missile threats. The strategy calls for a gradual disengagement from secondary theaters, such as Europe and the Middle East, to reposition forces in the Indo-Pacific and Western Hemisphere.

In Europe, the responsibility for conventional defense is formally transferred to allies, with the United States maintaining only a supporting role in logistics and nuclear deterrence. This deterrence is supported by the “America First Arms Transfer Strategy” of February 2026, which ties arms sales to the ability to build up the U.S. industrial base.

Arms sales are no longer considered diplomatic concessions but as a way to “supercharge” the American defense industry through over $300 billion in annual sales, prioritizing partners that invest seriously in their own self-defense.

Analysis of the Paradox of Semiconductors and Strategic Dependencies

In 2026, the semiconductor industry has reached a crisis point due to the boom in artificial intelligence (AI), despite a forecasted global revenue growth of $975 billion. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) continues to have a near-monopolistic share in the sector, with 90% of advanced chip production and 28% of wafer shipments at 3 nanometers.

Impact of AI Memories on Traditional Markets

While TSMC and Nvidia are reaping record profits from GPU demand for AI, traditional computing markets are in crisis. The giants of memory (Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron) have redirected production lines towards wide-bandgap memories (HBM) for AI accelerators, creating a devastating shortage of standard DDR4 and DDR5 memories.

Value

Price evolution and memory market (2025-2026)

$95

DDR5 32GB kit price (Mid-2025)

$550 – $600

Projected Q2 2026 DDR5 32GB kit price

478%

Price increase percentage (12 months)

70%

AI Data Center DRAM consumption worldwide (2026)

16-17% (below historical norms)

DRAM and NAND supply growth (2026 YoY)

This shortage has hit hard companies like Lenovo, the world’s largest PC manufacturer, which reported a 21% drop in profits in December 2025 despite an 18% increase in revenue. The Trump administration used this vulnerability to threaten tariffs up to 100% on South Korean chip producers unless they significantly expanded production on American soil, transforming the technological shortage into a lever of geo-economic coercion.

Analysis of the Energy Vector and Market Dynamics

The objective of U.S. energy policy in 2026 is to transform the sector into a dominant export industry capable of financing domestic growth. Washington pushes for total deregulation and increased liquefied natural gas (LNG) production, generating new dynamics among allies and adversaries.

Norway, the main supplier of gas to Europe, reached record investments in oil & gas in 2025, totaling 275 billion kroner (approximately $26.9 billion), driven by the development of new fields by actors like Equinor and Vaar Energi. However, forecasts for 2026 indicate a drop to 230 billion kroner, signaling potential tensions between long-term investment needs and global price volatility influenced by American policies.

Parallelly, Russia has intensified the use of energy as an asymmetric warfare tool. In February 2026, Moscow began providing oil to Cuba under the guise of “humanitarian aid” to counter the energy blockade imposed by the United States. Cuba was facing its worst energy crisis in decades after Washington cut off Venezuelan oil supplies following Maduro’s capture. In response, on January 29, 2026, Trump signed Executive Order 14380, declaring a national emergency regarding Cuba and authorizing tariffs on any nation that provides, directly or indirectly, oil to the island.

Marine shipments of Russian crude to China

1.86 million bpd (+46% YoY)

Status of supply to China

Russia surpasses Saudi Arabia as top supplier

Russian tourists stranded in Cuba due to lack of air fuel

~5,000

Tariffs removed by the Trump administration on India

25% (in exchange for stopping Russian crude)

Response to Trump’s Protectionist Strategy: Industrial Growth and Emission Trends in China

In response to the protectionist and coercive policies of the Trump administration, China has demonstrated a notable capacity for adaptation concentrated on advanced technological sectors. Segments of solar, electric vehicles (EVs), and batteries generated a record value of 15.4 trillion yuan in 2025, contributing 11.4% to China’s GDP.

Analysis of the Energy Vector and LCOE

On the environmental front, data from the first half of 2025 indicate a 1% reduction in Chinese CO2 emissions compared to the previous year. This trend, although still fragile due to the expansion of coal-to-chemical projects, suggests that China may have reached its peak emissions five years ahead of the 2030 target.

The Trump administration has reacted to this industrial success in China with punitive tariffs. Tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles rose to 100% in 2025, while tariffs on batteries and solar components reached 25-50%. This policy risks slowing the global transition towards clean energy, as American companies in the fashion and manufacturing sectors complain of unsustainable costs for sustainable materials now hit by reciprocal tariffs. The United States has also withdrawn from 66 international organizations, including IPCC and the Paris Accords, citing the need to protect national sovereignty.

Sustainability and Chinese energy sector (2025)

Value / Target

Value of clean energy sector

15.4 trillion yuan ($2.1 trillion)

Renewable share in electricity generation

~40%

Solar capacity installed (first 9 months 2025)

240 GW

H1 2025 electricity sector emission reduction

3%

Annual growth rate of clean-tech sectors

18%

Erosion of the Distinction between State and Private Infrastructure in the Expansion of American Power

The 2026 analysis highlights a structural paradox: while the Trump administration promotes an obsessive return to physical territory (walls, military bases, annexations), the projection of American power is undergoing deterritorialization. Power is no longer exclusively tied to control of land but to the ability to dominate information flows, financial transactions, and technological standards that operate beyond national jurisdictions.

The creation of the “Board of Peace” and the use of commercial messaging platforms for national security discussions indicate an increased integration between official state channels and private infrastructures. This phenomenon is also visible in the legal system: U.S. criminal jurisdiction has become “unmoored” from geographical boundaries, with courts extending their authority to extraterritorial acts committed in cyberspace. The limitation of national borders as a barrier to police power becomes increasingly weaker.

Simultaneously, the world witnesses a fragmentation into “technological fiefdoms” (digital feudalism). Africa and the Southern Global are new battlefields in this “cold digital war,” where the United States and China compete to incorporate entire nations into their technological spheres of influence, conditioning development aid on adoption of security standards and export controls from Washington.

Critical Analysis of Trump’s Geoeconomic Strategy: Dependencies and Limits to Resilience

Donald Trump’s strategic policy in 2026 represents a radical attempt to reconfigure American power in an era characterized by the relative decline of unipolar hegemony. Through the brutal use of geoeconomics, the restoration of aggressive hemispheric supremacy, and control over enabling technologies, Washington seeks to create a “new golden age” based on internal resilience and border protection.

However, criticalities are evident. Extreme dependence on TSMC, with the global semiconductor market representing 28% of the Taiwanese company’s market share, together with the structural crisis in memories that strangles the American technology industry, and China’s dominance in energy transition despite imposed tariffs, pose severe limits to a purely transactional strategy. These structural dependencies undermine America’s ability to ensure technological autonomy and energy independence.

In addition, internal factional struggles, highlighted by key figures like Michael Anton’s departure, raise doubts about the coherence and long-term reliability of an approach that trades historical allies for temporary commercial concessions. The fluidity of internal decision-making reduces strategic stability and increases the risk of policy inconsistencies.

The year 2026 ends with a fragmented global order where deterrence is no longer a stable equilibrium but an ongoing renegotiation under threat. The United States has abandoned the role of guarantor of global public goods to become a “norm destroyer” with the objective of extracting maximum value from the international system.


Bibliography

picture credit to https://unsplash.com/it/@zn35pjqq

  1. The New US National Security Strategy: A Transactional Document that Marginalizes Africa</spa […] https://www.fpri.org/article/2025/12/the-new-national-security-strategy/
  2. Key Takeaways from the 2025 National Security Strategy: What Has Changed and What It Means fo […] https://www.akingump.com/en/insights/alerts/key-takeaways-from-the-2025-national-security-strategy-what-has-changed-and-what-it-means-for-business
  3. White House Releases 2025 National Security Strategy | Brownstein https://www.bhfs.com/insight/white-house-releases-2025-national-security-strategy/
  4. Experts React: Trump Administration’s National Security Strategy – Stimson Center https://www.stimson.org/2025/experts-react-trump-administrations-national-security-strategy/
  5. National Security Strategy | The White House https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf
  6. Agency Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2026-2030 – U.S. Department of State https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Agency-Strategic-Plan-for-Fiscal-Years-2026-2030.pdf
  7. Experts React: The NSS and Washington’s New Approach to the Western Hemisphere< […] https://www.csis.org/analysis/experts-react-nss-and-washingtons-new-approach-western-hemisphere
  8. US National Security Strategy: The Trump Administration’s Vision for … https://studies.aljazeera.net/en/policy-briefs/us-national-security-strategy-trump-administration%E2%80%99s-vision-united-states-and-world
  9. Unpacking Trump’s National Security Strategy | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace</sp […] https://carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2026/01/trump-national-security-strategy
  10. Breaking down Trump’s 2025 National Security Strategy – Brookings Institution</ […] https://www.brookings.edu/articles/breaking-down-trumps-2025-national-security-strategy/
  11. Trump’s quest to transform the West – European Council on Foreign Relations</sp […] https://ecfr.eu/article/trumps-quest-to-transform-the-west/
  12. The 2026 National Defense Strategy by the Numbers: Radical Changes, Moderate Changes, and Som […] https://www.csis.org/analysis/2026-national-defense-strategy-numbers-radical-changes-moderate-changes-and-some
  13. State of U.S. Tariffs: May 12, 2025 | The Budget Lab at Yale https://budgetlab.yale.edu/research/state-us-tariffs-may-12-2025
  14. State of U.S. Tariffs: September 4, 2025 | The Budget Lab at Yale https://budgetlab.yale.edu/research/state-us-tariffs-september-4-2025
  15. What is Trump’s ‘America First’ trade policy agenda? – Brookings Institution</s […] https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-is-trumps-america-first-trade-policy-agenda/
  16. State of U.S. Tariffs: October 30, 2025 | The Budget Lab at Yale https://budgetlab.yale.edu/research/state-us-tariffs-october-30-2025
  17. Donroe Doctrine – Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donroe_Doctrine
  18. The global supply chain weather forecast shows persistent winds of change</span […] https://www.scangl.com/en-us/news/the-global-supply-chain-weather-forecast-shows-persistent-winds-of-change/
  19. The Trump Corollary: Venezuela as the First Test of a Neo-Monroe Doctrine</span […] https://orionpolicy.org/the-trump-corollary-venezuela-as-the-first-test-of-a-neo-monroe-doctrine/
  20. The Trump Corollary is officially in effect – Atlantic Council https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/dispatches/the-trump-corollary-is-officially-in-effect/
  21. The Impact of the Second Trump Administration on Latin American Foreign Policy< […] https://unu.edu/cris/journal-article/impact-second-trump-administration-latin-american-foreign-policy
  22. Trump 2.0 Enters 2026 in Full Force | Chicago Council on Global Affairs https://globalaffairs.org/commentary/analysis/trump-20-enters-2026-full-force
  23. Venezuela and Argentina updates – Scouts by Yutori https://scouts.yutori.com/3f49d21d-40b2-4d8a-9e71-dd30318ab6f0
  24. Ag Organizations React to U.S.–Argentina Beef Trade Agreement – Morning Ag Clips […] https://www.morningagclips.com/ag-organizations-react-to-u-s-argentina-beef-trade-agreement/
  25. U.S. to Quadruple Beef Imports from Argentina – Farm Policy News https://farmpolicynews.illinois.edu/2026/02/u-s-to-quadruple-beef-imports-from-argentina/
  26. More Argentina beef imports won’t do much to ease costs for consumers, according to experts</ […] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-beef-trade-argentina-executive-order/
  27. Trump quadruples Argentina beef import quota – Beef Magazine https://www.beefmagazine.com/policy/trump-quadruples-argentina-beef-import-quota
  28. Nebraska lawmakers, ag leaders say Argentine beef imports could … https://nebraskapublicmedia.org/en/news/news-articles/nebraska-lawmakers-ag-leaders-say-argentine-beef-imports-could-sideline-us-ranchers/
  29. Trump strikes deal to allow $800M in beef imports from Argentina to enter US – Reddit< […] https://www.reddit.com/r/Economics/comments/1qy3fed/trump_strikes_deal_to_allow_800m_in_beef_imports/
  30. Trade Agreement Finalized with Argentina | Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A. https://www.strtrade.com/trade-news-resources/str-trade-report/trade-report/february/trade-agreement-finalized-with-argentina
  31. Will Congress Do Another Farmer Aid Package This Spring? – Ag Bull Trading</spa […] https://www.agbull.com/will-congress-do-another-farmer-aid-package-this-spring/
  32. 2026 National Defense Strategy – Department of War https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jan/23/2003864773/-1/-1/0/2026-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY.PDF
  33. National Security Strategy: Potential Implications for DOD of Prioritizing the Western Hemisp […] https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF13137
  34. Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Establishes the America First Arms Transfer Strategy</s […] https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2026/02/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-establishes-the-america-first-arms-transfer-strategy/
  35. 2026 Global Semiconductor Industry Outlook – Deloitte https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/technology/technology-media-telecom-outlooks/semiconductor-industry-outlook.html
  36. memory – PRADEEP’s TECHPOINTS – WordPress.com https://pradeepstechpoints.wordpress.com/category/memory/
  37. Bull of the Day: Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) – February 9, 2026 – Zacks.com</spa […] https://www.zacks.com/commentary/2837666/bull-of-the-day-taiwan-semiconductor-tsm
  38. TSMC Reports Fourth Quarter EPS of NT$19.50 https://pr.tsmc.com/english/news/3281
  39. Why Smart Buyers Choose Refurbished During 2026 RAM Crisis | DCD https://discountcomputerdepot.com/ram-crisis-refurbished-buyers-guide
  40. AI reshaped the global CPU and RAM supply chain: What you can do now – Softchoice https://www.softchoice.com/blogs/cloud-migration-adoption-management/ai-reshaped-the-global-cpu-and-ram-supply-chain
  41. Global Memory Shortage Crisis: Market Analysis and the Potential Impact on the Smartphone and […] https://www.idc.com/resource-center/blog/global-memory-shortage-crisis-market-analysis-and-the-potential-impact-on-the-smartphone-and-pc-markets-in-2026/
  42. Lenovo Reports PC Shipment Pressure, Profit Decline Amid Memory Shortage – IndexBox https://www.indexbox.io/blog/lenovo-warns-of-pc-shipment-pressure-amid-memory-chip-shortage/
  43. China’s Lenovo warns of ‘prolonged’ memory crunch, looks to AI for rebound</spa […] https://www.scmp.com/tech/big-tech/article/3343355/chinas-lenovo-warns-prolonged-memory-crunch-looks-ai-rebound
  44. Memory shortage and tariff risks collide in AI chip supply – Sourceability</spa […] https://sourceability.com/post/memory-shortage-and-tariff-risks-collide-in-ai-chip-supply
  45. Norway’s oil, gas investment to hit record in ’25 | Amwal Al Ghad https://en.amwalalghad.com/norways-oil-gas-investment-to-hit-record-in-25/
  46. Norway eyes oil & gas investments of nearly $23 billion next year – Offshore Energy</span […] https://www.offshore-energy.biz/norway-eyes-oil-gas-investments-of-nearly-23-billion-next-year/
  47. Norway Oil and Gas Investment Surge in 2025 | Global Banking & Finance Review | GBAF</spa […] https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com/NORWAY-OIL-GAS/
  48. Increased estimate for oil investments for 2026 – SSB https://www.ssb.no/en/energi-og-industri/industri-og-bergverksdrift/statistikk/investeringer-i-olje-og-gass-industri-bergverk-og-kraftforsyning/articles/increased-estimate-for-oil-investments-for-2026
  49. Russia Expected to Supply Cuba With Oil as ‘Humanitarian Aid … https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2026/02/12/russia-expected-to-supply-cuba-with-oil-as-humanitarian-aid-a91931
  50. Kremlin Wants No Escalation, Calls Cuba Crisis ‘Critical’ As Russia Prepares Shipments […] https://www.ibtimes.com/kremlin-wants-no-escalation-calls-cuba-crisis-critical-russia-prepares-shipments-3797273
  51. Cuba Suspends Aviation Fuel Supply Amid Sanctions Pressure https://mexicobusiness.news/automotive/news/cuba-suspends-aviation-fuel-supply-amid-sanctions-pressure
  52. U.S. Declares National Emergency on Cuba and Announces Tariff Framework Targeting Oil Supplie […] https://www.gtlaw.com/en/insights/2026/2/us-declares-national-emergency-on-cuba-and-announces-tariff-framework-targeting-oil-suppliers
  53. U.S. Declares National Emergency With Respect to Cuba and Threatens New Tariffs on Countries […] https://sanctionsnews.bakermckenzie.com/u-s-declares-national-emergency-with-respect-to-cuba-and-threatens-new-tariffs-on-countries-supplying-oil-to-the-country/
  54. Russia’s January 2026 Crude Oil Shipments To China Up 46% Year on Year</s […] https://russiaspivottoasia.com/russias-january-2026-crude-oil-shipments-to-china-up-46-year-on-year/
  55. WHMI 93.5 FM Radio Station — Livingston County Michigan https://www.whmi.com/news/fox/russia-suspend-flights-cuba-trump-sanctions-cut-fuel-supply
  56. Analysis: Clean energy drove more than a third of China’s GDP growth in 2025 | News https://www.eco-business.com/news/analysis-clean-energy-drove-more-than-a-third-of-chinas-gdp-growth-in-2025/
  57. Sustainability in the News (January 19 – February 8, 2026) – Winssolutions https://www.winssolutions.org/sustainability-in-the-news-jan-19-feb-8-2026/
  58. Analysis: Clean Energy Carried China’s Economy in 2025, but Risks Are Rising</s […] https://www.caixinglobal.com/2026-02-06/analysis-clean-energy-carried-chinas-economy-in-2025-but-risks-are-rising-102412296.html
  59. China Economic Outlokk June 2025 – BBVA Research https://www.bbvaresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/202512_China_Outlook-f_edi.pdf
  60. Study shows that China’s carbon dioxide emissions will fall in the first half 2025. https://energynews.oedigital.com/mining/2025/08/21/study-shows-that-chinas-carbon-dioxide-emissions-will-fall-in-the-first-half-2025
  61. China | Climate Action Tracker https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/china/
  62. Analysis: China’s CO2 emissions have now been ‘flat or falling’ for 21 months – Reddit […] https://www.reddit.com/r/climatechange/comments/1r2flhz/analysis_chinas_co2_emissions_have_now_been_flat/
  63. What to watch: US-China tariffs dilemma for Europe, one culprit for sticky US inflation and C […] https://www.allianz.com/content/dam/onemarketing/azcom/Allianz_com/economic-research/publications/specials/en/2024/may/2024_05_16_what_to_watch.pdf
  64. How Rising Global Trade Costs Are Reshaping Fashion in 2025 https://www.smartfashion.news/blog/how-us-tariffs-are-transforming-fashions-futureand-its-sustainability
  65. 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy: Key Shifts & Priorities https://behorizon.org/2025-national-security-strategy/
  66. China risks missing 2025 climate goal amid coal dependency | ESGBusiness https://esgbusiness.com/news/china-risks-missing-2025-climate-goal-amid-coal-dependency
  67. Today’s Globalization Wave seen through a Geopolitical Lens: processes of de-territorialisati […] https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David-Criekemans/publication/353287390_Today’s_Globalization_Wave_seen_through_a_Geopolitical_Lens_processes_of_de-territorialisation_versus_re-territorialisation/links/60f15c8f16f9f313008792c5/Todays-Globalization-Wave-seen-through-a-Geopolitical-Lens-processes-of-de-territorialisation-versus-re-territorialisation.pdf
  68. Trump’s America: Playing the Victim – Journal #84 – e-flux https://www.e-flux.com/journal/84/150668/trump-s-america-playing-the-victim
  69. Full article: A digital cold war in Africa? Capitalist multiplicity, digital transformation, […] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01436597.2025.2546668
  70. Intervento del Ministro dell’Interno tenuto 12 dicembre 2022 in occasione della cerimonia di […] https://scuolainterforze.interno.gov.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Rivista-3-2022-Polizia_INTERNO_DEF.pdf
  71. Is Trump reshaping the world order? – Brookings Institution https://www.brookings.edu/articles/is-trump-reshaping-the-world-order/
  72. News of Interest to MSU – Daily News Digest (Mississippi State University)</spa […] https://www.digest.msstate.edu/?issue=2025-03-26
  73. Territoriality in American Criminal Law – Michigan Law Review https://michiganlawreview.org/journal/territoriality-in-american-criminal-law/
  74. Text: AMERICA ON THE GLOBAL STAGE: EXAMINING EFFORTS TO SECURE AND IMPROVE THE US TRAVEL SYST […] https://www.congress.gov/event/119th-congress/house-event/LC74705/text
  75. Global semiconductor industry could grow 12% (18%) in 2026: Malcolm Penn – DQIndia https://www.dqindia.com/esdm/global-semiconductor-industry-could-grow-12-18-in-2026-malcolm-penn-11018356